fbpx
08.07.2020 0

Yates, Comey & FISA court say they didn’t know Steele sub-source folded on allegations in Jan. 2017

Yates says Comey had the FBI ambush Michael Flynn in the White House ‘unilaterally,’ was unaware Steele sub-source folded on Trump-Russia allegations in Jan. 2017:
http://dailytorch.com/2020/08/yates-says-comey-had-the-fbi-ambush-michael-flynn-in-the-white-house-unilaterally-was-unaware-steele-sub-source-folded-on-trump-russia-allegations-in-jan-2017/

“I didn’t authorize that interview because I wasn’t told about it in advance… I was upset that Director Comey didn’t coordinate that with us and acted unilaterally.” That was former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, telling Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham in Aug. 5 testimony that former FBI Director James Comey did not clear with the Justice Department his plan to send FBI agents to interrogate then-National Security Advisor Michael Flynn in the White House on Jan. 24, 2017 shortly after President Donald Trump was sworn into office. Comey kept the then-Acting Attorney General Yates in the dark about something that by all accounts was a serious breach of protocol — an attempt to entrap the President’s top foreign policy advisor to take out the President. The agents questioned Flynn on what turns out were routine discussions with Russian Ambassador Sergei Kislyak during the presidential transition. Yates was apparently also in the dark about the FBI’s separate Jan. 24, 2017 interview of the primary source used by former British spy Christopher Steele in drafting the dossier falsely alleging President Donald Trump was a Russian agent and that the Trump campaign knowingly assisted Russia in hacking the Democratic National Committee and putting its emails on Wikileaks. The source ended up contradicting Steele’s allegations in the Jan. 2017 interview, leaving the FBI with no real witnesses of Trump’s supposed treason. If Yates didn’t know, then the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which is supposed to assist the President in his duties to combat enemies of the U.S. foreign and domestic with the gathering of intelligence, should be abolished immediately. Nobody responsible for overseeing the surveillance of U.S. citizens or even the President verifies the most important allegations. Not the Justice Department. Not the FBI. And not the FISA court. Do you think FISA should be abolished?

_

Americans for Limited Government: https://getliberty.org
Daily Torch: http://dailytorch.com 
Facebook: https://facebook.com/AmericansForLimitedGovernment/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/LimitGovt and https://twitter.com/Daily_Torch
Parler: https://parler.com/profile/LimitGov

Copyright © 2008-2024 Americans for Limited Government