Why we should be worried about Alan Greenspan’s negative interest rate prediction. It might mean the end of capitalism.
http://dailytorch.com/2019/08/why-we-should-be-worried-about-alan-greenspans-negative-interest-rate-prediction-it-might-mean-the-end-of-capitalism/

While the financial and political media were panicking about the 10-year, 2-year treasuries interest rate inversion, former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan was predicting that U.S. treasuries’ interest rates could very well go into negative territory in the near-future. If interest rates are going negative, it could very well be forecasting slower economic growth or no growth at all, low inflation or even negative inflation, and higher unemployment. The federal government would earn interest instead of owing it for deficit-spending. Individuals would be incentivized to stop working and take on debt to earn interest. It would be helicopter money. Where would this lead our society?

Democratic candidates’ hateful labeling of President Trump and his supporters as white supremacists is wrong, dehumanizing and dangerous:
http://dailytorch.com/2019/08/democratic-candidates-hateful-labeling-of-president-trump-and-his-supporters-as-white-supremacists-is-wrong-dehumanizing-and-dangerous/

Leading Democrats for the presidential nomination have apparently decided that their path to victory in the wake of the El Paso and Dayton mass shootings lays with demonizing President Donald Trump and his supporters as white supremacists and racists. They’re just saying it aloud now. One hopes this is just a cynical ploy to boost their poll numbers as the New Hampshire primary and the Iowa caucuses near, but it is hard not to start to worry that this is the radicalization of a mob that is thirsty for mob justice. Doesn’t anyone think this is way over the top? Or worried that this sort of dehumanizing rhetoric has dangerous implications for the future of this country? Or could be construed as another incitement to and legitimization of political violence? This is beyond irresponsible, it is reckless and dangerous. What do you think?

Deficit likely to come in just shy of $1 trillion in 2019, latest Treasury figures show:
http://dailytorch.com/2019/08/deficit-likely-to-come-in-just-shy-of-1-trillion-in-2019-latest-treasury-figures-show/

With just two months remaining in fiscal year 2019, come Sept. 30, the U.S. budget deficit appears likely to come in just shy of $1 trillion, the latest data from the U.S. Treasury shows. Since 1980, the debt has grown on average 8.8 percent every fiscal year, but during that same period, the U.S. economy has only averaged 5.4 percent nominal growth economic nominally before adjusting for inflation. As a result, the debt is now 105 percent of the economy. And if those trends were to continue, the debt will top $100 trillion in 2037, and exceed 193 percent debt to GDP. What does that look like? Just ask Japan, with a 200 percent debt to GDP ratio, whose economy has barely grown nominally in 20 years amid a declining population. What can be done to prevent such an outcome?

Trade in goods deficit with China down 10 percent first half of 2019, or $18.8 billion:
http://dailytorch.com/2019/08/trade-in-goods-deficit-with-china-down-10-percent-first-half-of-2019-or-18-8-billion/

The U.S. trade in goods deficit with China is down 10 percent in the first six months of 2019, or $18.8 billion, compared to 2018, according to the latest data from the U.S. Census Bureau. And that’s with the first tranche of tariffs by President Donald Trump that was in place until May. Then, Trump raised the tariff to 25 percent for the $250 billion of goods and in July he added another 10 percent tariff on the remaining $300 billion of goods. If it hurts bad enough, it might be able to force China to the table, but with China’s devaluation of the yuan, the Fed has to get the dollar right and not let it get too strong or it could undermine everything the administration is hoping to achieve. What do you think?

Want to stop China from manipulating the yuan and the dollar? Bar it from buying treasuries, Mr. President:
http://dailytorch.com/2019/08/want-to-stop-china-from-manipulating-the-yuan-and-the-dollar-bar-it-from-buying-treasuries-mr-president/

Now that the U.S. Treasury has labeled China a currency manipulator, President Donald Trump should consider barring it from purchasing any more treasuries as a penalty. After all, China needs to keep buying treasuries to exert its trade advantage and keep the yuan weak to boost its exports. Without treasuries to fall back on, the yuan could appreciate vis a vis the dollar, even with the fixed exchange rate. That would give the tariffs, now 25 percent on $250 billion of Chinese goods, and 10 percent on the rest of the $300 billion of them, some real teeth. It would also create a very real penalty for currency manipulation, and serve as a deterrent to other countries that want to play games with the dollar. What do you think?

China proves it manipulates currency with immediate yuan devaluation upon new 10 percent tariff on $300 billion of goods, rate cuts, Treasury acts with official designation:
http://dailytorch.com/2019/08/china-proves-it-manipulates-currency-with-immediate-yuan-devaluation-upon-new-10-percent-tariff-on-300-billion-of-goods-rate-cuts-treasury-acts-with-official-designation/

Immediately upon President Donald Trump’s announcement of a new 10 percent tariff on $300 billion of goods shipped to the U.S. that came atop the 25 percent on $250 billion of goods, coupled with the Federal Reserve cutting interest rates, China has responded in kind with another devaluation of the yuan by another 2.6 percent. This comes atop the devaluation in May in response to the initial imposition by Trump of 25 percent tariffs on the first tranche of $250 billion of goods shipped to the U.S. Now, with the most recent move, the total devaluation rises to 4.8 percent since May. That is absolutely currency manipulation. Trump was right about Beijing. What do you think?

Massacres in El Paso, Dayton underscore that political violence right or left is never the answer:
http://dailytorch.com/2019/08/massacres-in-el-paso-dayton-underscore-that-political-violence-right-or-left-is-never-the-answer/

After a bloody weekend that saw 29 killed in mass shootings in El Paso, Texas and Dayton, Ohio, the nation must once again face and confront the scourge of political violence and terrorism that is becoming increasingly prevalent in our society on the extreme ends of the political spectrum, right and left. An anti-immigrant manifesto that has been linked to the shooter in El Paso who supported President Donald Trump and praised the Christchurch mosque shooting in New Zealand and the racist manifesto the shooter left behind there. The Dayton shooter on the other hand was a self-proclaimed leftist and Satanist who supported Sen. Elizabeth Warren who had previously spoke against mass shootings such as Parkland, and who on the anniversary of violence in Charlottlesville, Va. wrote, “Kill every fascist” and called the ICE firebomber a “martyr.” The violence and the varied motivations for it demonstrate that violence is never the answer, and whether it comes from the right or left, we must stand united against it as a nation — before it is too late. Will you stand with us against these despicable acts?

The Trump economy remains strong enough as 2020 fast approaches:
http://dailytorch.com/2019/07/the-trump-economy-remains-strong-enough-as-2020-fast-approaches/

The Trump economy grew at 2.93 percent in 2018, the best year since 2005, according to the most recent data. Unemployment remains at a 50-year low of 3.7 percent, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Wage growth since 2017 is the best seen since the financial crisis, most recently at 2.8 percent growth in the first quarter of 2019. 4.9 million jobs have been created since 2017. For 16-to-64-year-old working age adults, the economy is definitely improving, the civilian labor force grew by 2.1 million, outpacing population that increased by about 1 million between 2016 and 2018. Those are good numbers. Former President Barack Obama got reelected with numbers that were much, much worse. What do you think?

Another brick in the wall as Supreme Court upholds Trump reprogramming funds for southern border wall. Democrats whine after they voted for it.
http://dailytorch.com/2019/07/another-brick-in-the-wall-as-supreme-court-upholds-trump-reprogramming-funds-for-southern-border-wall-democrats-whine-after-they-voted-for-it/

Brick by brick, figuratively, with a serious assist from the Supreme Court ruling that reprogramming $2.5 billion of counter-narcotics monies may be used towards the southern border wall, Donald Trump is fulfilling his promise to get the wall built. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi complained on Twitter, “This evening’s Supreme Court ruling allowing @realDonaldTrump to steal military funds…” Here’s the best part: Democrats voted for all of it. Specifically, the National Defense Authorization Act of 2019, the bill which allowed the $2.5 billion for counter-narcotics barriers to be built, passed with 185 Democrats voting in the affirmative in the House. Every Democrat except for Sen. Bernie Sanders voted for it in the Senate. Similar overwhelming Democratic majorities voted for another $6.1 billion for the wall and another $4.5 billion to address the humanitarian crisis on the border the Trump administration requested. How will Dems in 2020 say they want to tear down the wall they voted for?

Trump, Barr set sights on Big Tech over antitrust concerns:
http://dailytorch.com/2019/07/trump-barr-set-sights-on-big-tech-over-antitrust-concerns/

The Antitrust Division of the Justice Department is setting its sights on big tech firms like Google, Facebook, Twitter and Amazon in announcing a review of potentially anticompetitive activities that could be limiting consumer choices. The push comes on the heels of the White House Social Media Summit where President Donald Trump citied censorship on social media as a major concern of his administration. To follow up the summit, Trump promised that there would be a meeting with “representatives of the major social media platforms” to have “a real conversation”about the issue. Now, given the Antitrust Division’s statement that “If violations of law are identified, the Department will proceed appropriately to seek redress,” those meetings may have become a whole lot more interesting. Perhaps a deal can be struck that avoids a confrontation. What do you think?